In development. Nunc is not yet generally available. We're selecting a small number of New Jersey firms as design partners.
Nunc Request early access

Facts you can cite. Law that actually binds.

Nunc reads a case file and builds a chronology where every fact points back to its source, and every fact is checked against the law of the venue you're actually in — not the law in general.

Request early access See how it works

One entry in the ledger

14 Mar 2023
Exact date

Prior slip incident reported at the north entrance and logged by the shift supervisor.

Vasquez Dep. 142:8–19 · confirmed by A. Okonkwo

Authority on this fact

Nisivoccia v. Glass GardensBinding

Mode-of-operation notice · 412 citing references · no negative treatment

Flagged

Limitations period runs 02 May 2025

N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2 · two years · computed from the accrual date, under the statute as it stood then

Illustration of the intended output. Nunc is in development and this is not a screenshot of shipping software.

What it does

Three things, in order

Documents go in. What comes out is a chronology an associate can defend line by line, and a partner can read in ten minutes.

First

A fact ledger, not a summary

Depositions, emails, records and contracts are read and reduced to dated facts. Each carries the verbatim language it came from and a citation precise enough to pull up in seconds. Conflicting accounts are kept and linked, never quietly resolved — a contradiction between two witnesses is usually the case, not an error.

Then

The law of your venue

Every fact is checked against the jurisdiction the matter is actually in. Limitations periods are computed from the statute as it stood on the accrual date, not today's text. Evidentiary problems — hearsay without an exception, an unauthenticated document — are raised while there's still time to fix them.

Then

Authority that binds

Nunc traces the citation network to surface the cases a court in your venue is bound to follow, ranked by how heavily they're relied on and filtered for negative treatment. Binding and persuasive authority are labelled separately, because the difference decides motions.

Where your files live

Inside your firm's tenant, not ours

Nunc installs into your own SharePoint. Case documents stay where your firm already keeps them, under the policies you already run.

What that means in practice

Most legal AI asks you to upload privileged material to a vendor. We think that's the wrong question to put to a firm, so we removed it.

Your retention policies apply

Because the documents never leave your environment, the retention, eDiscovery and DLP rules you've already configured govern them automatically.

Ethical walls use your directory

Screening a conflicted attorney off a matter means removing them from a group in your own Entra ID. It takes effect immediately, and your IT team already knows how.

Access is granted per site

Nunc requests permission to specific matter sites rather than to your tenant. Consent is scoped, auditable, and revocable at any time.

Nothing trains a model

Client material is never used to train or fine-tune anything. That's a contractual commitment, not a settings toggle.

Citations

A fabricated case is not an acceptable failure

Lawyers have been sanctioned for filing briefs containing cases that don't exist. The architecture below is the reason we think that can't happen here — and it's worth reading before you trust any tool of this kind, ours included.

  • Closed-world citation

    The model may only cite opinions retrieved into its context for that specific question. Citing from memory is disabled, and enforced on the output rather than merely requested in a prompt.

  • Every citation resolved

    Each citation is parsed and matched against a real opinion record before display. Anything that can't be resolved is never shown to you.

  • Deadlines computed, not written

    Limitations and deadline calculations run in code, from a rules table curated and reviewed by lawyers. The model explains the result. It never performs the arithmetic.

  • Silence over invention

    "No binding authority in this jurisdiction addresses this fact pattern" is treated as a correct answer, measured as one, and preferred to a confident wrong one.

  • You confirm every fact

    Nothing enters the authoritative chronology until an attorney has reviewed and confirmed it. The tool proposes; you decide.

Coverage

Deep in one place before broad in many

Nunc is built on a corpus of more than ten million US court opinions. But coverage of statutes, local rules and standing orders is what makes an answer reliable, and that's built jurisdiction by jurisdiction. We publish exactly where we are.

New Jersey state courts Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Law and Chancery Divisions
First jurisdiction
District of New Jersey Opinions, local civil rules, and judge standing orders
First jurisdiction
Third Circuit & U.S. Supreme Court Binding federal authority for New Jersey matters
First jurisdiction
New York and Pennsylvania Opinions held; rules and statutes not yet curated
Planned
Remaining states and circuits Opinions searchable; treated as persuasive only
Planned

We'd rather tell you a jurisdiction isn't ready than let you rely on thin coverage.

Early access

We're looking for a few New Jersey firms

Design partners help decide what gets built and in what order, run real matters through early versions, and get preferential pricing when Nunc becomes generally available.

This is likely a fit if

  • You handle civil litigation in New Jersey, in a firm of roughly 5 to 150 attorneys
  • Your firm already runs on Microsoft 365 and SharePoint
  • Building a chronology is real, recurring, unrecoverable time on your matters
  • You're willing to tell us plainly when something we've built is wrong

Email us about early access

Or write to info@nunc.tech. Tell us your practice area and venue and we'll reply with what's ready and what isn't.